Thursday 28 September 2017

Guest Article: Lessons on Creating Powerful Moments of Performance [Free Webinar] by Ben

Before I get too far off topic, I’d love for you to join me on a webinar next week to hear about the new performance management research I’ve been working on. It tells a very compelling story and I think you’ll enjoy it. Plus I will be joined by an HR leader from a company that was able to successfully make the transition to a more coaching/development-focused model, and you and I both will get to quiz her on the transition, building a business case, and more. If you sign up and can’t make it, we’ll make sure you get the recording to view later. 

I’m reading a new book, and it’s pretty amazing. The Power of Moments tells stories and gives examples of how to create amazing moments of value for employees, students, families, etc. Two of the principles from the book can be leveraged for employee reviews and I want to focus on them today.

Assurance + Expectations > Feedback

The first concept is called Assurance + Expectations. Researchers performed a study on students that received graded feedback on their work.

  • In the first group, students received a generic “these comments are feedback.”
  • In the second group, students received “I’m giving you this feedback because I have high expectations and know you can do better.”

After receiving the feedback the students had the opportunity to edit and resubmit their work. A much larger portion of group two resubmitted their work for review. But why?

The concept comes down to Assurance + Expectations. If we provide assurance and give a set of expectations, we can empower individuals to perform at a higher level, provide greater depth, and make the transaction much more of a positive experience. Those individuals in group one didn’t get any positive reinforcement, insight into expectations, etc.

Within the performance process, it’s not enough just to give someone a piece of feedback and move on, especially when it’s critical. We need to provide critical feedback in the context of assurance (you can do great work) and expectations (I expect you to do great work). That relatively minor change shifts the whole context of the conversation from punishing someone for messing up to helping them discover how they can improve.

Backward Integrated Design

 

The second concept that applies to the performance management process is backward integrated design. This basically means backing out the design process and starting with the outcomes you hope to achieve. For example, many would say the ideal outcome of performance appraisals would be to help employees perform better. But when we look at how they are structured (especially when done once or twice a year), that simply can’t be the case, because we spend our time measuring their old performance, rating it, telling them what they did right or wrong, etc.

Instead we need to think about what actually creates better performance:

  • Recognition
  • Coaching
  • Feedback

By incorporating these elements into the process we can actually improve our chances of hitting the overarching goal of improving employee performance. Our research shows that high-performing companies are much more likely than low performers to use these and other elements in the performance process. If you want to hear more about that, be sure to sign up for the webinar! I know it’s going to be a blast.


Article source:Ben - Lessons on Creating Powerful Moments of Performance [Free Webinar]»

Check out more of Ben Uebanks' work at Upstart HR

Guest Article: Does anybody take CareerOne seriously any more? by Ross Clennett

"We’re not a job board anymore”: CareerOne CareerOne has abandoned its job board in favour of a "skills marketplace" …….. the company is now actively working to change perceptions about its business. ShortList, 11 March 2014 CareerOne strategy “Flipping 180 degrees” CareerOne is refocusing on its core job board platform as part of a strategy and website overhaul, with renewed
Article source:Ross Clennett - Does anybody take CareerOne seriously any more?»

Check out more of Ross Clennett's work at hisblog

Monday 25 September 2017

Guest Article: Can I Focus on Compliance and Still Be a Good Employer? [Podcast] by Ben

HR compliance is a necessary evil in the workplace. Rarely do employers make it to the top of the “best employers” lists by handling FMLA or DOL regulations well. Yet time and time again we see HR professional flocking to sessions like “Top 10 Ways to Get Sued in 2018,” taking notes like this is golden content.

Why do sessions like those attract so much attention when they don’t help employers create a more employee-centric, engaging workplace?

In today’s podcast discussion, I get the answers to these questions and others by interviewing Mike Haberman, one of the HR industry’s best resources for staying on top of compliance and labor requirements. Mike takes a very balanced approach by covering not only the compliance topics, but also by exploring future trends and how employers can improve their HR practices.

It’s a fun discussion and listeners will be treated to the story of when I was audited by the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, providing a great example of how NOT to make decisions about what’s best for your employees. #truestory

To connect with Mike or learn more about his work, you can find his blog at:
http://ift.tt/qddzIW

To listen to the archives of We’re Only Human and learn more about the show, check out:
http://ift.tt/2jqDL7I


Article source:Ben - Can I Focus on Compliance and Still Be a Good Employer? [Podcast]»

Check out more of Ben Uebanks' work at Upstart HR

Guest Article: Our Egos are a Problem at Work. But Not in the Way You Think. by Jennifer Miller

no drama masksThe word “ego” carries a lot of baggage, with connotations like: Blowhard. Difficult to get along with. Egomaniac. Middle man to the Id and Superego. Rarely have three letters evoked so much emotional drama. In fact, perhaps you experienced a bit of inner turmoil prior to clicking the link to this blog post. Because, of course, you don’t have a problem with your ego, do you? No, I didn’t think you did.

But here’s the thing: it’s a whole lot easier to see someone else’s ego than it is to see ours. It’s like that little speck of green stuff leftover from lunch that’s stuck in between your two front teeth. You can go along all afternoon, not knowing it’s there. But others do. And then, when you finally see yourself in mirror, it’s like Crap! Seriously?! How long has that been there?

The thing about ego is that we all have one. And we all need one. A healthy ego is an important part of navigating our lives, both inside and outside of work. It’s when our ego gets distorted that the trouble starts. You might not like to hear it, but this distortion is not just the purview of the egomaniac. The distortion is within all of us.

Enter Cy Wakeman, a self-described “drama researcher” and New York Times bestselling author of several business books. Wakeman’s latest book, No Ego: How Leaders Can Cut the Cost of Workplace Drama, End Entitlement, and Drive Big Results   http://amzn.to/2flsGWb published recently. “The ego is the part of the psyche that mediates self-identity and experience. It’s instrumental in governing how we adapt to reality,” writes Wakeman. Having an ego isn’t the problem. The challenge, says Wakeman is that the ego’s main role is to generate drama, or what Wakeman calls, “emotional waste.” Wakeman and her team of researchers define emotional waste as, “mentally wasteful thought processes or unproductive behavior that keeps leaders or their teams from delivering the highest level of results.” Wakeman observes that the ego is an “unreliable narrator” of our reality, because it “delights in the drama it can create.”

Wakeman’s view of the ego is less about confidence and more about about how much you let the stories you tell yourself dictate how you see the “reality” of your situation. If your reality is highly distorted by your ego’s narration (“Why does this always happen to me?” “I can’t believe they let the XYZ department get away with that!” “Here we go again! Yet another change management initiative”) you’ll lose productivity.

So our egos are a problem at work. But maybe not the way that you were thinking about when first started reading this article. Let’s set aside the very real scenario that there are egomaniacs at work and instead examine how all of us (this blogger included) let our egos get in the way of us doing our best work.

Here’s an example from my own experience at work:

When I worked in corporate America, I was lucky enough to work for a great work team leader. My projects were interesting and my colleagues were great people. Nothing to complain about, right? Well, every so often, a dictate would come from the corporate office located thousands of miles away from our field office that would make me seethe with anger. In my view, the requests were unreasonable, the deadline was ridiculous and there was no good business reason for the task we were assigned. I confess that when these “ridiculous” assignments were doled out, I did my fair share of eye rolling. Although I’m more or less a “put on your big girl pants” kinda gal, for some reason, I couldn’t get over the “unnecessary” elements of these requests. So I wasted time each day for several days (or weeks!) in a row fretting about how stupid my assignment was. I even commiserated with others on how “dumb” and “out of touch” the corporate office was.

This, according to Wakeman, was my ego creating emotional waste—concocting all sorts of internal monologues about why the task was unreasonable . . .why it was wasteful and unfair to ask these things of us . . . and so on.

So here’s where the rubber meets the road. You might think, “well, OK Jen, that’s not really all that big of a deal. Everyone gets annoyed with their employers. Who doesn’t vent once in awhile?” And although it’s true we all need to let off a little steam, what happens if we get stuck in the drama? Consider the few minutes each day I let my annoyance get in the way of productivity. (Remember, I’m more or less a “let’s get on with it” person. I certainly wasn’t spending hours each day worrying about this stuff. But I’d bet the more drama-prone among us could rack up an hour or more each day in needless fretting.)

Not convinced? Wakeman’s research indicates that the average employee spends 2 hours and 26 minutes per day in drama and emotional waste. That’s over two hours a day, with people driving what Wakeman calls their BMW’s (Bitching, Moaning, Whining) into their manager’s or HR’s office, “engines idling, wasting fuel and polluting the atmosphere.”

The book No Ego offers Wakeman’s take for how to create an environment of accountability for both managers and employees, one that will lead to a focus on achieving business results together. She stops short of saying, “This is the prescription. Do this and all with be fine.” Her observations are certainly thought-provoking, and not always received positively. Amazon reviewers of No Ego, plus some of Wakeman’s own book club participants expressed concerns about Wakeman’s philosophy, seeing it as too cut-and-dried, or not compassionate enough.

As for me and my ego? I have a different take on the concepts in No Ego. What Wakeman proposes—true, clear-eyed accountability is tough. It’s very uncomfortable to look at ourselves in the mirror and see the green stuff in our teeth. It’s easier to make someone or something else the reason for our challenges. But, as Wakeman is fond of saying, “Your circumstances are not the reason you can’t succeed. Your circumstances the reality in which you must succeed.”

So I’ve been working harder each day to ensure that when I hear the rev of my BMW’s engine, I take a moment to consider: how much of this drama am I helping to create?

 

Disclosure: I participated in Cy Wakeman’s No Ego Book Club and received a complimentary book for the purposes of this book review. Some of the links in this post are affiliate links. It’s up to you to decide if you find the book reviewed in this post of value.

Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

 


Article source:Jennifer Miller - Our Egos are a Problem at Work. But Not in the Way You Think.»

Thursday 21 September 2017

Guest Article: How to Comfort Employees in Times of Need by Ben

I know I need to focus on engagement and our HR strategy. But how can I do that when some of our employees don’t even have homes to go home to?

When I had this conversation with an HR leader based in Houston just after the hurricane had unleashed flooding on the state, I had to think carefully about what I was going to recommend. In the end, what I told this woman was the same thing I will recommend today in more detail.

how to comfort employeesWhen employees are going through a tough time, we need to recognize the fact that they are humans.

People.

Individuals.

That man? He’s someone’s father, brother, or son. That woman? She’s someone’s mother, grandmother, or daughter. Just like the story I told in my initial episode of We’re Only Human when the podcast launched last year, it’s important to see people as people.

I haven’t lost sight of the fact that business often goes on as usual in many circumstances. Things need to get done. But by focusing on the person and their fundamental needs first, you can earn amazing loyalty that is difficult to quantify.

One really easy way to show that you care for someone in more mundane circumstances, such as when a child is sick, an employee is dealing with an aging parent, or even a more positive situation like the birth of a child, is to send something unexpected. Research shows that we don’t just like general surprises, we actually like to be delighted.

Spoonful of Comfort is a great example of how to do this with a relatively low investment. Recently my wife and I were struggling to handle several travel activities for my job while juggling the needs of our kids. Plus our youngest was facing a few doctor’s visits for some issue. Basically we were stretched to the max. Thankfully, the team at Spoonful of Comfort sent a care package over for me to test out and it happened to come at the exact perfect time for us. I was so appreciative!

  • We didn’t have to worry about pulling together a family-friendly meal
  • We were able to focus our time on our family needs and taking care of other priorities
  • One word: cookies.

If you’re looking for a simple, practical way to help your workers through a tough time, send them something that feeds their body while also meeting their need for appreciation and attention at the same time.

On a broader scale, people want to know that their employers care about them. They want to know that their managers and others are thinking of them, especially when things are difficult in their personal lives. In the instance of this horrific damage done in Texas, Florida, and elsewhere, it’s important for us as business leaders to stay in tune with what our employees need and make sure we’re offering a helping hand to the extent possible.

I can vividly remember when tornadoes ripped through north Alabama six years ago and one of our employees that had been with us for two days lost his home. Everyone gathered around him in spirit by donating leave so he could take the time with his family to recover and begin the project of replacing what they had lost.

Like many things in HR, this is simple, even if it’s not always easy in the moment. Pay attention to your people. Treat them like people. Meet their basic, fundamental need for attention and support. And in the long term, it will be worth the investment in the lives of the people that enable your business to function.


Article source:Ben - How to Comfort Employees in Times of Need»

Check out more of Ben Uebanks' work at Upstart HR

Guest Article: The Power of Community: Thank you Robert Van Stokrom and Charles Cameron by Ross Clennett

As I considered the impact of the 2017 RCSA International Conference: The Power of Community I started to write about the impact that the conference had on me. Then I read Aspect Personnel’s Founder and Managing Director, Matthew Sampson’s blog on the same topic. Matt perfectly captured what I, and I suspect many other delegates, experienced : The sense of community with my fellow delegates, the
Article source:Ross Clennett - The Power of Community: Thank you Robert Van Stokrom and Charles Cameron»

Check out more of Ross Clennett's work at hisblog

Tuesday 19 September 2017

Guest Article: New Research: Be Weird to Get the Hiring Manager’s Attention by Ben

I received the highlights from a new CareerBuilder study this week and they made me laugh for two reasons. First, because some of these ideas are actually pretty good, and second, because whoever wrote the press release of the data analysis is a bit off the mark. The gist of the research was this: people are looking for jobs (no surprise there) and some of them are doing interesting, strange, or downright weird things to try and stand out from the crowd.

A sampling of the strange

From the press release:

Hiring managers gave the following examples of unusual tactics job seekers used to stand out:

  • Candidate gave the hiring manager a baseball that read: “This is my best pitch of why you should hire me.”
  • Candidate sent the hiring manager daisies with a note that said “Pick me, pick me.”
  • Candidate brought their mother to the interview as an in-person character reference.
  • Candidate developed a whole website dedicated to the hiring manager, asking to be hired.
  • Candidate hugged the hiring manager when introduced instead of shaking hands.
  • Candidate got up from interview and started waiting on customers because the business got busy.
  • Hiring manager had a candidate volunteer to work at the business for a month before submitting an application to show that she was able to do the job.
  • Candidate presented a thick scrapbook of certificates, awards and letters.
  • Candidate sent a Christmas card every year for three years.
  • Candidate sent a cake with their resume printed on it.

Let’s take a moment to break a few of those down before pointing out the interesting flaw in the logic here.

  • The good: candidate got up during interview and started waiting on customers because the business got busy

While this seems like a strange move, I think it’s actually really interesting. If we set aside any labor laws or FLSA issues of having someone perform a work task among real employees for 10-15 minutes, this is the perfect way to see if someone can actually perform the job. In a study we did earlier this year, we found that candidates actually desire assessments and opportunities to prove their ability to perform on the job (they don’t really like generic assessments with no link to the actual work duties).

  • The bad: candidate sent cake with resume printed on it

This is weird. I like cake more than the average person, and even I wouldn’t eat a cake with a resume printed on it. Yes, I understand that the point is to get in front of the hiring manager, but this has nothing to do with qualifications, value, or usefulness. It doesn’t prove to me anything other than you are looking for ways to cut corners and get results without being willing to do something useful like networking, demonstrating value, etc.

  • The ugly: candidate brought mom to interview

Seriously?

I don’t know that I even need to say anything here. The moment I see a candidate bring his or her mother, I immediately dismiss them as capable of anything other than calling mommy for help when the pressure is on. Don’t do this and don’t tolerate this.

Does this actually help you get a job?

Back to the findings:

Stunts can have a negative impact on your chances of getting the job — more than a quarter of employers (26 percent) say unusual attention seeking antics from job seekers would make them less likely to call a candidate in for an interview.

While some read this as “26% of employers say you are less likely to get an interview,” I read this as “74% of employers DO NOT say you are less likely to get called for an interview.” That’s interesting because if I use one of these stunts to get attention, I am three times as likely to get attention based on the data they are presenting, even though they skew it the other direction by saying one out of four companies is turned off by these types of antics.

Here’s a clue if you’re searching for a job: don’t rely on some weird tactic to get you in the door. Just like you wouldn’t want to date someone that rides up on a unicycle juggling flaming batons, you shouldn’t be swayed by people relying on these kinds of attention-grabbing activities to showcase their skills (unless it’s a really unique case of having to use those kinds of skills, which is a one-in-a-million kind of thing).

What about you? Any interesting stories of things candidates have done to get attention that are outside the norm of phone calls, emails, hard copy resumes in the mail, etc.? 


Article source:Ben - New Research: Be Weird to Get the Hiring Manager’s Attention»

Check out more of Ben Uebanks' work at Upstart HR

Friday 15 September 2017

Guest Article: Propaganda, Culture & Employer Brand by Jay Kuhns, SPHR

You spend so much time telling me your culture and people are the most valuable assets of your organization....but you don't round, you don't invest precious resources in employees, and you spend your whole day in meetings claiming to be busy.

You don't have the culture you think you do.

Your turnover hasn't improved in a meaningful way for years

You don't dare take risks to move your organization from old school to a cutting edge contemporary company...but...

...you care about your organization and your employees.

Please. Stop. Talking.
All of this has happened on your watch.

If you believe that your press releases, HR policies, and "Memos to Staff" are even remotely based on how your employees, and potential employees view your organization you are kidding yourself.

You can not hide from reality.
You can not hide from indecision.
You can not hide from how the world sees you.

Please. Start. Doing.
Here's the good news. You have the ability, today, to turn your excuses into a well thought out plan of action. It will require effort. It will require perceived risk...and it will require your leadership.

No one else can do it but you.

Step One
Take a look at your value statements, your messages to your employees, and (if you have anything) the messages to prospective candidates about your organization on your career site.

Now, align your behavior, the time on your calendar, and the words you use with your colleagues to match these messages.

Step Two
Build a comprehensive employer brand strategy to immediately begin using your employees as both retention and talent attraction tools.

Step Three
Ignore the noise. Your senior leadership colleagues will not understand what you're doing. Your Marketing department will feel incredibly threatened because they will have no idea what you're doing either.

Keep pushing. Only you can make this happen. 

It will be lonely...and nerve-wracking...and...

...IT WILL WORK!

How About You
Are you ready to finally get rid of all of those tired excuses you've been using since the 1990s?

There is a reason HR does not get the respect it deserves, and that starts with us.

You can do it...and I will help you if you need me.

I'd love to hear from you.

No Excuses.

pic
Article source:Jay Kuhns, SPHR - Propaganda, Culture & Employer Brand»

Check out more of Jay Kuhns' work at No Excuses HR

Tuesday 12 September 2017

Guest Article: Simple, Not Easy by Jay Kuhns, SPHR

I've attended many leadership development classes. I've facilitated hundreds of hours of them too. In addition, conferences have been a regular part of my life for years as an attendee and speaker, and I've sought out the leadership-oriented sessions at every opportunity.

Through it all, the various approaches discussed, models I presented, and the themes about effective leadership behaviors all seemed so...

simple.

Why Are We Still Talking About This
So why are we still struggling to move from all of the talk about effective leadership, to workplace cultures that have world class leaders with employees lined up to join their teams?

Anyone?

The answer actually is quite simple...

...leadership is hard. 


All of the wisdom, case studies, models, encouragement, examples, and fancy jargon are incredibly useful up to the point where we have to do something. It's the "doing" that is so damn hard. 

If we think about practicing a musical instrument for hours, it still feels very different when we take the stage and perform in front of a crowd. 

If we think about practicing a sport for hours, it still feels different when we step on the ice or court to play in front of a crowd.

And when we lead people, it is very different from "practicing" in an artificial classroom setting.
How About You
What approach do you take to transition from the simple messages around effective leadership behavior and turn them into your leadership practice? Would your employees tell me you are doing a good job; or, is there some room for humility, and then improvement?

I'd love to hear from you.

No Excuses.

pic
Article source:Jay Kuhns, SPHR - Simple, Not Easy»

Check out more of Jay Kuhns' work at No Excuses HR

Monday 11 September 2017

Guest Article: Help Me Pick the Next Great HR Tech Company by Ben

This year I have the honor (and challenge) of being one of four analysts working with the HR Technology Conference to pick the next great HR tech company. Of the hundreds of submissions to this year’s contest, eight have been selected and four will actually get to present on-stage at HR Tech to a live audience. That audience will vote on who is the best and a new champion will be crowned.

With that in mind, I’d love some help! I am coaching two companies in the contest, Papaya Global and Proxfinity. In this semifinal round of voting, you can only pick one, but I’d love for you to take a few minutes and check out all of the contenders and make your vote heard!

If you like the podcast medium, you can listen here to Steve Boese, Chairman of the HR Tech Conference, and George LaRocque, a friend, analyst, and the President of the Ben Eubanks fan club (his words, not mine) talk about the eight companies.

If you prefer to read, here is the link to the contest overview where you can learn about the participants and place your vote.

About My Picks

I have two completely different companies in the running and both of them are doing really innovative work. I love both of these companies and would be thrilled to see either of them enter the finals!

Papaya Global is a solution that helps companies that are expanding globally. They focus not just on the compliance side and helping employers understand how to set up entities (or not), hire locally, and manage their payroll and benefits, but they also provide a technology platform that offers transparency and scalability. I’ve hired internationally before. It’s a huge challenge for smaller companies that don’t have a ton of resources and experience. And with more companies expanding globally than ever before (the US has a 4% unemployment rate, for goodness’ sake), this is the time for a company like Papaya to step up. The other angle on this is the increasing reliance on contingent labor. If I need a part-time developer for six months, it may be easier to find and hire that person in Singapore or Brazil than it would be to find, hire, and release that person in my home country. These project-based hires are becoming more frequent in today’s world, which means there’s a big need to fill.

Proxfinity is focused on creating connections in and among your workforce and providing analytics on those connections in ways you could have only dreamed of. It hinges on a few things, primarily a wearable badge that flashes when you are in proximity to someone else with similar interests so you can make that physical connection. I’ve always said there’s nothing that substitutes for a face-to-face conversation and Proxfinity is making those easier than ever. Plus, you can see analytics on the back end, which opens up a world of possibilities. For example, you may find out that your onboarding meetups are not properly mixing your new staff with executives, which may prompt you to change your approach. Or you might realize that while you promote diversity and inclusion, in reality the various groups of workers don’t mix as you might hope. Finally, you might just need to get your people outside their comfort zone and interacting with workers in other departments and functions, and you can program the badges to light up when someone is nearby that doesn’t have your same type of job. It’s a new area for HR to get into but I think there is incredible promise, and it’s the only solution in the competition with a wearable/hardware component.

Don’t forget to vote here. And if you’re going to be at HR Tech this year, let me know and we can try to connect!


Article source:Ben - Help Me Pick the Next Great HR Tech Company»

Check out more of Ben Uebanks' work at Upstart HR

Thursday 7 September 2017

Guest Article: Bleed the Fifth by Jay Kuhns, SPHR

"If you are a boss, ask yourself: When you look back at how you've treated followers, peers, and superiors, in their eyes, will you have earned the right to be proud of yourself? Or will they believe that you ought to be ashamed of yourself and be embarrassed by how you have trampled others' dignity day after day?"
Robert I. Sutton

Fear
For those that believe they are "great leaders" and have so much experience and "always know the answers" I have some bad news for you.

You have created a corporate culture rife with fear. 

Yes you have. 

Your arrogance and "coaching" are not perceived the way you've convinced yourself that they are. Your teams are not being honest with you, they are worried about losing their jobs, and the fact that you are "always right" simply adds fuel to the culture bonfire you've created.

You Can't Change
Well, maybe you can change. But I suspect it will be the most difficult thing you've ever done in your career, and here's why.

You have to actively infuse humility into who you are as a leader.

I'm not talking about dropping a bunch of leadership jargon on the team. I'm not talking about employee feedback sessions that you facilitate and get the comments that you were expecting all along.

Newsflash! They are not going to tell you their truth. They will continue to bleed quietly and "accept" your reality.


As the high value team members slip away, and you continue to behave in the exact same way year after year, it makes me wonder how much longer the tired excuses can be used to justify the same results?

How About You
What would it take for you to really change your style? Perhaps if you were threatened with your position? Maybe if you publicly fell flat on your face and your team, despite their feelings about how you treat them, rallied to support you?

What would it take for you to get over yourself?

I'd love to hear from you.


No Excuses.

pic
Article source:Jay Kuhns, SPHR - Bleed the Fifth»

Check out more of Jay Kuhns' work at No Excuses HR

Wednesday 6 September 2017

Guest Article: Clarius Results: Sales slump in booming market and another full year loss by Ross Clennett

Clarius (I still can’t bring myself to call them by their awful new name, Ignite Services) has just reported a disastrous 2016/17 financial year result. In a year when Hays reported their combined Australian and New Zealand operations drove gross profit up by 11 per cent and operating profit up by 14%, Clarius managed to go in the other direction to an embarrassing extent. Financial
Article source:Ross Clennett - Clarius Results: Sales slump in booming market and another full year loss»

Check out more of Ross Clennett's work at hisblog

Tuesday 5 September 2017

Guest Article: 3 Keys to Creating Engaging Learning Experiences [Webinar] by Ben

engaging learning experiencesBy now you’ve most likely heard about and begun thinking about the employee experience, because you can’t turn around without reading an article or hearing someone speak about it. In essence, it’s a deeper look at the practices you use across the board to create lasting value for employees in the workplace. Within that conversation, one area that I think is going to really explode in growth in the coming year is the learning space. At Lighthouse I’m just wrapping up some research on the topic and have an upcoming webinar to share the findings and some ideas for how to make this work.

For instance, there’s a specific practice that high performers follow before developing learning content that separates them from low-performing companies. Hint: it’s more than just throwing out yet another eLearning module that employees have to click through and get credit for. Sign up at the link to join me on the webinar and learn that and other insights from the study!

The Truth About Creating Learning Experiences

It’s all about the experience. Learning content isn’t just about volume or format–it’s about creating a high-quality learning experience that resonates with your audience. Yet according to our new Learning Content Strategy research study, just one in four companies says their learning experiences are engaging and drive value for those that consume the content.

Yet high-performing companies, as identified in the study, are much more likely to say that great learning content leads to a variety of positive outcomes, from better business and individual performance to higher consumption of mission critical content. Creating engaging learning experiences isn’t just a “nice to have”–it’s essential for success.

And don’t forget: today’s learners have higher expectations than ever before. You’re not just competing with work tasks with your content–you’re competing with mobile apps, entertainment, and other sources of information for their attention and brainpower. In order to meet and exceed those expectations, we need to rethink how we approach learning content and the user experience.

Key Stats from the Data

The research data tell an interesting story. For instance:

  • One in five companies admits that their learning content doesn’t engage learners and doesn’t create a positive learner experience. 
  • Less than 3 in 10 companies say they have a strong L&D strategy in place that is driving content development and deployment.
  • The number one driver of learning content is to close skill gaps. This is validated by companies pointing out that, the most common measure of learning effectiveness is better performance.
  • Nearly half of companies are allocating 10-25% of their L&D budgets to content strategy, development, and delivery.

 

I’d love to have you join me on an upcoming webinar to explore these topics! I’ll be sharing not only the research but also a few stories of companies that have taken a stand and said they are going to change their approach to be more employee-centric. The session will not only cover the key pillars of learning content strategy (process, governance, user experience, etc.) but also how to target learner populations and more. I hope to see you there!


Article source:Ben - 3 Keys to Creating Engaging Learning Experiences [Webinar]»

Check out more of Ben Uebanks' work at Upstart HR

Guest Article: 3 Tips for More Productivity with Less Stress by Jennifer Miller

When you think “time management,” what are the productivity practices that will make the most difference? We’re always trying to squeeze as much as we can out of our days. But here’s the thing: there are only so many hours in the day and only one of you. I’ve finally surrendered to the fact that there will never be enough time to do everything I want to do. But there’s always time to do the most important things, as long as you have a good system.

Which brings me to a recent conversation I had with David Maxfield, VP of Research for VitalSmarts, and co-author of several New York Times bestselling books, including one of my favorites,  Influencer: The New Science of Leading Change. I interviewed David to learn more about a partnership that the VitalSmarts team has formed with productivity master David Allen, of the Getting Things Done® (“GTD”) methodology.

David Maxfield (identified as “Maxfield” in this post to distinguish him from David Allen) offered me three simple ways to get started on how to create more productivity, while reducing your stress. His suggestions are based on Allen’s GTD model. VitalSmarts research has found that people who follow both effective communications practices and productivity tips like the ones below are 18 times less likely to feel anxious and overwhelmed at home and at work than their less productive peers.

Here is an excerpt from my conversation with Maxfield, along with my personal observations about the productivity tips offered.

Step 1: Capture everything that comes in and out of your head.

Says David Maxfield:

It’s important to have a small number of ways that you can capture ideas, the to-do’s, assignments, tasks. For me, it’s this:  I carry a pad of post-it notes and I have it near me wherever I am. I use my email inbox and I use a pad of blank paper. So, nothing real fancy. But whenever I have an idea or I get an assignment or whatever, I record it on one of those three tools. That’s what I mean by a “small number” of ways. Probably not more than three. Make your tools reliable and simple, so you can catch everything. David Allen is famous for saying,  “Your mind is for having ideas not for holding them.” You’ll be able to create a lot more ideas if you are not busy holding them.

Jen’s reaction to this idea: I like how this system is decidedly low-tech and low cost. Of course, in today’s digital age, you could do an electronic version of note keeping with an app or even simply use the notes feature on your phone. The key thing is, you can’t keep everything in your head; you won’t remember it. One additional thing Maxfield told me: whatever you choose, make it something you can (and will) use. I’ve tried various digital apps and they just don’t work for me, so I’ve moved back to analog for most note-keeping and then once a week, I pull everything into Trello for flagging and project tracking.

 

Step 2: Clarify everything in your “inbox” from top to bottom at least once every 24 to 48 hours.

Says David Maxfield:

Your “inbox” means all of the data that you’ve captured. Go through your email, go through your post-it notes, go through notes on your lined paper at least once every couple of days and clarify them to determine, “what is the next step that needs to happen here?” And put it where it needs to go. The mistake people make is they use their email as a storage bin. I’ll talk with people who have 300, 400 emails; and it’s not that they’ve never read them. They have read them 12 times, because each time they read them, they say, oh, well I’m not going to do that one yet. But they don’t clarify what the next action would be or where it should go. So I say, “Top to Bottom”: Begin at the top and go to the bottom. Do this once every couple of days to keep things moving forward.

Jen’s reaction to this idea: True confession time: I positively, absolutely, stink at this step. It’s what hangs me up Every. Single. Time. I know David Allen is famous for saying, “get the inbox to zero.” Frankly, I don’t think that’s possible. But I think a person can get a lot closer to zero inbox items by creating discipline around this step. I’m going to attempt to ask, “what’s the next step?” each time I realize I’ve “parked” something in my inbox or To Do list.

 

Step 3: Take stock once a week.

Says David Maxfield:

Keep a sacred, non-negotiable meeting with yourself, at least once a week, to catch up, to get current, and to align with your priorities. The purpose of this meeting is to check in with yourself: are you spending your time on the right kinds of tasks? So, they include your home, your work, your aspirational goals, your reactive goals. Ask yourself, are these [goals] finding their way into [your To Do list]? It’s a chance to analyze and adjust.

Jen’s reaction to this idea: this is the most important element of the three tips listed. After all, what good is “getting stuff done” if it’s the wrong stuff? I’ve listed this as the third suggestion because it’s the order in which Maxfield listed it. Personally, I would put this first on the list. I’m old-school and learned time management from Hyrum Smith, who espoused a values-based approach to deciding what goes on the To Do list.

The bottom line of these productivity tips:

This 3-step process isn’t brand-new by any means. In fact, Maxfield joked with me that his wife says he only studies things that are painfully obvious. Maxfield told me, “I love it when two things happen: when common sense isn’t very common and when common sense makes a lot more sense than people realize. And I think these principles fall into that category. Very few people do them, but the ones who do them experience incredible benefits, both to their performance and to their stress levels.”

Thank you, David Maxfield for bringing a new focus to time-tested ideas for personal productivity!

 

Photo credit: Pixabay


Article source:Jennifer Miller - 3 Tips for More Productivity with Less Stress»

Friday 1 September 2017

Guest Article: Don’t Overload Your Team Ecosystem With Star Players by Jennifer Miller

stars

You want a team loaded with star players, right? What leader wouldn’t want a team filled with high-performing folks?  Isn’t a team stacked with rocks stars is a good thing? It depends. Research into team performance reveals a surprising element: you can have too much of a good thing.

Consider the study reported in Gartner’s Talent Daily blog, which shows that high performance among waitstaff is “contagious,” meaning that moderately competent servers up their game when working alongside more talented waitstaff. But there was a point at which having too many star servers on one shift tended to demoralize other staff members and actually cause them to under-perform. Article author Oana Lupu offers this take-away: “It seems that the [teachable idea for leaders] is about finding the right balance: not too many high performers, and not too many average or low performers on the same team.”

The world of professional sports is loaded with examples of teams who can’t bring home the championship, despite a roster loaded with star talent. This Scientific American article explores studies that have examined the reasons for low team performance. It all comes down to how much you need your team to function as a truly cohesive unit.  There’s a “tradeoff between top talent and teamwork,” writes article author Cindi May. “These [study] findings suggest that high levels of top talent will be harmful in arenas that require coordinated, strategic efforts, as the quest for the spotlight may trump the teamwork needed to get the job done,” observes May.

You may be thinking, that’s all well and good for sports teams and retail service providers, but what if I lead a team of knowledge workers? Does this research translate?

Absolutely, says Tamra Chandler, CEO of Peoplefirm, a Seattle-based consulting firm that specializes in helping organizations achieve strategic performance by tapping into employee motivation. Chandler has found that there’s definitely a downside to having too many driving, high-achievers on one team in your office. “None of us want a team of all rock stars. Because if you have too many people who are ‘killing it’ alll of the time, they will probably kill each other in the end,” says Chandler.

Instead, advises Chandler, you need a balance of skill sets. In her work with companies, Chandler has found that, “the healthiest organizations have a range of people with a diversity in capability, strengths and interests.” Organizations tend to prize (and compensate) the more strategic-oriented players in an organization, says Chandler. But don’t undervalue the folks with talent for the more mundane, daily tasks. Teams need to be comprised of a variety of people— some of whom want the high-visibility, high-stakes tasks, and others who are more comfortable in the background, supporting others. “We tend to assume that everyone wants to do the ‘sexy’ work or the ‘cool’ projects, but that’s not always true,” Chandler asserts.

To find the right balance within a team, leaders should ask a very important question of their team members: what do you love to do? This helps align employee interests to the team’s goals. It’s also important to remember that this isn’t an endorsement for leaders to tolerate mediocre performance, or overlook a lack of “fit” within the team.  A leader’s role is to help every team member perform up to his or her full potential, whatever that is.

As with many things in life, “too much of a good thing” applies in team composition as well. Whether it’s retail customer service, sports teams or office workers, it pays to understand the role your star employees play in delivering top team performance. Strike a balance that encourages others to perform well, but doesn’t overload the team ecosystem.

A modified version of this post appeared as part of Smartbrief’s Originals series.

image credit: Pixabay


Article source:Jennifer Miller - Don’t Overload Your Team Ecosystem With Star Players»